Monday, March 28, 2011

Blog Question #7

Discuss the three types of scrutiny and how they are applied to the 14th amendment.

1. Strict Scrutiny - courts that use strict scrutiny give the government no room for error in convincing them that the classification is necessary. Thus, making this the most strict degree of scrutiny. Once a court decides that strict scrutiny is the appropriate standard, then the court will uphold the state action only if it is necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest.

2. Intermediate Scrutiny - available to courts to analyze state action that discriminates against people on the basis of gender, illegitimacy, and alienage. The government need only show that its actions were substantially related to its goal. The governments objectives need not to be compelling but the must be important.

3. Rational Basis - type of scrutiny that applies to all classifications not covered by strict or intermediate scrutiny. The courts are charged with ensuring that people are afforded equal protection under the law, so governmental decisions that classify and differently treat groups of people must be scrutinized. Only have to show a legitimate reason for the classification.

The 14th amendment of the Untied States says "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." These are the different types of scrutiny that courts use to rule on Equal Protection Clause cases.

http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=6267347

In this article, Dez Bryant of the Dallas Cowboys is being sued for 246,000 dollars worth of jewelry tab he has not paid to a New York based company. Bryant's attorney says they are making progress in solving the issue and the question only remains how much Bryant really needs to pay. Paying the bill shouldn't be a problem.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Blog Question #6

What is Risk Management Process (provide more than one word for each step - tell me what each step is in a sentence or two? Then walk me through a sport related example.

Risk Management Process: 3 steps

1. Recognition - involves thinking about both the general categories of hazards to address and the specific hazards within those categories. This recognition results in a decision by management to act on either a specific or identified risk category.

2. Analysis - Once the manager recognizes the need to address the risk, she should analyze specific or categories of risk. The analysis should consist of two parts which often overlap and work together: risk identification and risk evaluation.

3. Action - Once a risk has been recognized and analyzed, the manager must decide whether to act on the perceived risk and, if so, the type of action to take. There are four different types of actions that a manager can choose to take including retention, treatment, transfer, and avoidance.

Sports Related Example:

A sports facility with a baseball field has been repetitively getting reports from teams and players that the field is in bad shape. There are many mounds in the infield and holes in the outfield that are causing the games to be affected. There has also been an ankle sprain from a hole in the outfield and a ball that hit a player in the eye because of bouncing off a mound in the infield. Management recognizes that there is a risk for player safety with the shape that their field is currently in. The management team then goes out to the baseball field and looks for all holes and mounds that may be causing this type of injury. They then determine the potential liability these obstacles might have and evaluate the extent of the risk. The management team then decides that they are going to take action in the form of treatment such as smoothing out the mounds in the infield, or filling in the holes in the outfield.

Sports Related Article:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=6243247

Three years after Barry Bonds was charged with lying to a grand jury over whether he knowingly used performance enhancing drugs, the perjury trial is to start with the selection of the jury. Many jurors were ruled out for various reasons including their allegiance to Barry and the San Francisco Giants. At this point, Barry Bonds has pleaded not guilty to the charges that he lied to the jury.